DRC Logo

Davide Raro Consulting

Aviation & Meteorological Solutions

Fusing Multi Source Aeronautical Data into One Authoritative Real Time Feed: A Practical Playbook for CAAs

Civil Aviation Authorities face a data deluge from AIP, NOTAM, surveillance and satellite services. Learn a practical architecture and governance approach to fuse multiple inputs into a single authoritative real time feed and how FlyClim eAIP helps deliver it.

·Davide Raro
data fusioneAIPreal time feeds
Introduction Civil Aviation Authorities are ingesting more operational data than ever. Traditional AIP publications and NOTAM services now coexist with space based surveillance, aircraft telemetry, satcom reports and low altitude traffic systems. The result is opportunity and complexity. When these sources are combined thoughtfully, operators get richer situational awareness and safer flight operations. When they are not, conflicting guidance and duplicated effort create risk and operational friction. This article gives a practical playbook for fusing multi source aeronautical data into a single authoritative real time feed and explains how FlyClim eAIP supports each step. Why data fusion matters now New surveillance and connectivity services add coverage and timeliness. Space based ADS B extends tracking to oceanic airspace. Satcom provides higher bandwidth exchanges between aircraft and ground. Urban air systems and remote sensors add fine grained local information. Operators want to use these inputs but they need a single authoritative source they can trust. Fusion eliminates contradictions, reduces rekeying, and provides a machine readable record that downstream systems can consume reliably. Common fusion challenges Source conflicts. Different systems report overlapping facts with small discrepancies in coordinates timing or status. Provenance and trust. Consumers need to know which source created each element and which source is authoritative when there are conflicts. Timing and effective dates. A change might be immediate for operations but scheduled for the next AIRAC cycle for planning systems. Semantic mismatch. Data models differ across systems so the same concept may be represented in different ways. Security and sovereignty. Multiple feeds and cloud services raise concerns about data protection and regulatory compliance. A practical fusion architecture Ingestion layer. Collect raw feeds from AIP editors NOTAM systems surveillance providers satellite services and UTM platforms. Normalize formats to a canonical exchange such as JSON or AIXM inspired structures. Validation and normalization. Run deterministic checks aligned to ICAO Annex 15 for coordinates, identifiers and frequency formats. Normalize units and coordinate reference systems so downstream logic can compare values reliably. Source scoring and priority rules. Assign trust scores and priority order to each source. For example, an administrative AIP update signed by the authority outranks an external observation for permanent data. Conversely, live surveillance may outrank stale published values for real time positional information. Make these rules explicit and auditable. Semantic reconciliation. Map equivalent fields across sources and apply transformation rules. Use controlled vocabularies for status values and link related objects such as procedure modules and associated aerodrome records. Conflict resolution engine. When two sources disagree, apply a deterministic rule set. Examples include prefer authoritative source, prefer most recent validated timestamp, or flag for human review when risk thresholds are exceeded. Record the reason for every reconciliation decision. Publishing and versioning. Produce a single authoritative record for each aeronautical object and store it in a versioned repository. Keep signed snapshots per AIRAC cycle and provide change history so consumers can verify provenance. Event distribution. Emit event driven notifications and webhooks so consumers receive the authoritative change as soon as reconciliation is complete. Distinguish AIRAC bound releases from operational immediate updates so consumers know whether a change is planning oriented or operational. Sandbox and consumer validation. Allow consumer systems to subscribe to a staging feed where they can run ingestion and contract tests prior to any effective date. This reduces surprises on go live and accelerates onboarding. Governance and operational controls Define data contracts. Agree schemas, units and semantic definitions with major consumers. Publish versioning and deprecation policies so integrations remain stable. Establish approval gates. Keep named human approvers in the loop for high impact reconciliations such as procedure geometry or runway data. Automate low risk changes while preserving audit logs. Audit and provenance. Log the original source, the applied rule, the approver identity and timestamps. These records are essential for regulatory reviews and incident investigations. Security and sovereignty. Use tenant level isolation, encryption in transit and at rest, and strong identity management for editorial and API keys. Provide deployment options that meet national data residency rules. KPIs to measure success Time from source event to authoritative feed availability Number of conflicts detected and automatically reconciled Percentage of reconciliations requiring human intervention Downstream consumer adoption measured as percentage on authoritative API feeds Reduction in post publication corrections and emergency NOTAMs How FlyClim eAIP makes multi source fusion practical Central canonical repository. FlyClim treats each AIP module as a versioned object so reconciled records are stored as the single source of truth. Versioning and signed snapshots provide the audit evidence regulators require. Flexible ingestion and export. The platform accepts JSON and XML inputs and exports machine readable authoritative feeds. Event driven webhooks allow downstream systems to subscribe to reconciled changes. Strong validation engine. Built in checks aligned to ICAO Annex 15 and EUROCONTROL guidance normalize and validate coordinates, frequencies and identifiers before reconciliation. Configurable conflict rules. FlyClim supports configurable business rules for source priority and automated conflict resolution while routing high risk items to human reviewers with visual diffs. NOTAM linkage and operational coordination. The platform links temporary notices to authoritative records so operational messages remain consistent with reconciled content. Sandbox and digital twin support. FlyClim provides staging feeds and sandbox endpoints so consumers can validate ingest and contract tests before an AIRAC or an operational release. Security and deployment flexibility. Multi tenant isolation, private cloud and managed hosting options let authorities meet security and sovereignty constraints while still benefiting from shared platform investments. Consulting and integration services. FlyClim helps design the data contracts, onboarding plans and governance processes that make fusion projects successful. Practical deployment roadmap 1. Map inputs and consumers. Inventory all data sources and downstream systems. Identify overlaps and likely conflict hotspots. 2. Define minimal canonical schema. Start with a compact set of fields for high value objects like aerodrome reference points, instrument procedures and airspace constraints. 3. Pilot ingestion and validation. Ingest three months of data into a sandbox, normalize formats and run validation rules to surface common anomalies. 4. Configure reconciliation rules. Start with a conservative priority order and route ambiguous cases to human reviewers. Track false positive rates and refine. 5. Run a release through the twin. Prepare an AIRAC candidate in the sandbox, validate consumer ingestion, and capture reconciliation evidence for auditors. 6. Expand and automate. Add more sources and refine rules. Introduce predictive signals to prioritize human review where risk is highest. Conclusion Fusing multi source aeronautical data into a single authoritative real time feed is a practical way to deliver timely, trusted information to operators. The approach reduces contradictions, lowers manual rework, and creates a provable chain of custody that regulators and consumers can trust. FlyClim eAIP provides the structured repository, validation, reconciliation controls and event distribution mechanisms that Civil Aviation Authorities need to operationalize data fusion. To explore a pilot or technical review visit https://eaip.flyclim.com and learn more about FlyClim services at https://flyclim.com. For a direct discussion contact me at davide@flyclim.com.
Fusing Multi Source Aeronautical Data into One Authoritative Real Time Feed: A Practical Playbook for CAAs | Aviation Insights | Davide Raro Consulting | Davide Raro Consulting