DRC Logo

Davide Raro Consulting

Aviation & Meteorological Solutions

Data Quality in Aeronautical Information Why It Matters Now

Practical guidance for CAAs and ANSPs on improving aeronautical data quality to meet Annex 15 and modern digital operations.

·Davide Raro
data qualityAIMeAIPAnnex 15AIXMSWIMAIP publicationFlyClim
<h2>Introduction</h2><p>Reliable aeronautical information is at the heart of safe efficient and predictable air operations. As aviation moves toward digital services such as SWIM and AIXM based exchanges the need for trustworthy data has become a network level priority. This article reviews current trends regulatory context and practical steps to improve data quality in aeronautical information management.</p><h2>Why data quality is an urgent priority</h2><p>Recent industry focus on digitalisation and operational data sharing has exposed weaknesses in legacy AIM processes. Fragmented sources manual reentry and inconsistent validation allow errors to propagate from national AIP publications into flight planning systems and ATM applications. Poor quality data increases operational risk creates extra workload for controllers and pilots and can lead to costly rework for AIM units.</p><h3>Regulatory and technical context</h3><ul><li>ICAO Annex 15 sets out the requirement to ensure quality accuracy and timely distribution of aeronautical information.</li><li>PANS AIM provides procedural guidance for AIM units to manage content and quality control.</li><li>EUROCONTROL promotes common practices for data quality and interoperability through guidance and specifications.</li><li>Technical standards such as AIXM and WXXM support structured exchange of aeronautical and meteorological data and enable automated validation.</li></ul><h2>Key dimensions of aeronautical data quality</h2><p>Data quality is not a single metric. AIM professionals should consider multiple dimensions when assessing their information landscape.</p><ul><li><strong>Accuracy</strong> Correct coordinates values and textual descriptions that reflect the true operational environment.</li><li><strong>Consistency</strong> Agreement between AIP publications NOTAM entries charts and aeronautical databases.</li><li><strong>Completeness</strong> Presence of all required attributes and metadata for each data element.</li><li><strong>Timeliness</strong> Updates and amendments are available to users within required publication timeframes.</li><li><strong>Traceability</strong> Clear audit trail linking originator change history and approvals for every item.</li><li><strong>Conformance</strong> Adherence to formats and schemas such as AIXM and regional specifications.</li></ul><h2>Current trends and recent developments</h2><p>Industry initiatives in the past years have accelerated attention on data quality. SWIM programmes continue to expand and require higher levels of semantic interoperability. AIXM adoption has increased allowing AIM systems to exchange feature rich data. At the same time regulators are reinforcing expectations for quality management aligned to Annex 15 and PANS AIM. Technology advances allow automated validation and continuous monitoring which were not feasible with legacy tools.</p><h2>Practical steps to improve data quality</h2><p>Improving data quality is a programme not a one off project. The following steps provide a practical roadmap aligned to regulatory requirements and operational needs.</p><ol><li><strong>Perform a baseline assessment</strong> Map data sources flows and common failure points. Measure error rates and identify high risk data elements.</li><li><strong>Define quality rules</strong> Translate Annex 15 and operational requirements into machine readable validation rules for attributes ranges and cross references.</li><li><strong>Centralise authoritative sources</strong> Establish a single source of truth for aeronautical data and ensure that AIP and derived products are generated from it.</li><li><strong>Automate validation</strong> Implement automated checks for geometry accuracy attribute completeness and cross publication consistency.</li><li><strong>Integrate publication pipelines</strong> Link NOTAM systems AIS databases and chart production so changes flow once and are propagated automatically.</li><li><strong>Implement version control and traceability</strong> Record change metadata user identities and approval timestamps to support audits and investigations.</li><li><strong>Measure and report</strong> Use dashboards to monitor key quality indicators and publish performance to stakeholders.</li></ol><h2>Common challenges and how to overcome them</h2><p>Many organisations face cultural and technical barriers when improving data quality. Typical challenges include resistance to change fragmented IT landscapes and limited data governance capabilities. Overcome these by starting small showing measurable benefits and involving stakeholders from operations and safety oversight.</p><h3>Example actions</h3><ul><li>Run a pilot on a single high impact data set such as aerodrome reference points and use automated checks to show error reduction.</li><li>Provide training for AIM staff on AIXM and data modelling so teams can author structured content rather than unstructured text.</li><li>Establish a data governance forum that includes ATM stakeholders airlines and regulator representatives to agree priorities and acceptance criteria.</li></ul><h2>How FlyClim supports data quality improvement</h2><p>FlyClim eAIP Platform is designed to help CAAs and ANSPs implement the steps described above and meet Annex 15 obligations. Key capabilities that support data quality include a central content repository structured editing tools and configurable validation rules. The platform creates a single source of truth for AIP content and enables automatic generation of consistent outputs for PDF html and data services. Learn more about the eAIP Platform and its core features on our site https://eaip.flyclim.com/eaip and https://eaip.flyclim.com/features</p><h2>Metrics that matter</h2><p>When implementing a data quality programme focus on measurable outcomes that reflect operational benefits. Useful metrics include error rate per publication item time to publish after a change number of manual correction events and user reported incidents linked to data inconsistency. Tracking these metrics over time demonstrates return on investment and supports continuous improvement.</p><h2>Conclusion</h2><p>Data quality in aeronautical information is a foundational requirement for safe and efficient aviation. The move to digital exchange and structured data formats offers the opportunity to raise quality significantly but requires focused governance process change and enabling technology. CAAs and ANSPs that adopt a pragmatic approach to validation centralisation and traceability will reduce operational risk and deliver more reliable services to pilots controllers and airline operators. FlyClim eAIP Platform is built to support this journey and to make compliance with Annex 15 and related guidance practical and sustainable.</p><p>For a practical review of your current data quality posture or to arrange a demonstration contact our team at FlyClim.</p>
Data Quality in Aeronautical Information Why It Matters Now | Aviation Insights | Davide Raro Consulting | Davide Raro Consulting