DRC Logo

Davide Raro Consulting

Aviation & Meteorological Solutions

Aviation Cyber Security Protecting Aeronautical Information in a Connected Era

How Civil Aviation Authorities can protect authoritative aeronautical data against emerging cyber threats and why secure eAIP platforms are essential.

ยทDavide Raro
cybersecurityaviationAIPeAIPICAOdata securityCAA
<h2>Introduction</h2><p>Connected avionics satellite communications and API first aeronautical data feeds create great operational value and at the same time introduce new cyber risk for Civil Aviation Authorities and air navigation service providers. Protecting authoritative AIP content is now a safety critical responsibility. This article lists the current threat landscape outlines practical security controls and shows how a secure eAIP platform such as the FlyClim offering reduces risk while enabling modern operations.</p><h2>Threat landscape for aeronautical information</h2><ul><li>Unauthorized modification of AIP content that can create unsafe procedures or wrong coordinates</li><li>Supply chain compromise in third party tooling that injects malicious changes into data exports</li><li>API abuse and credential theft that allows attackers to read or write authoritative feeds</li><li>GNSS spoofing and data integrity attacks that rely on mismatches between published data and operational sensors</li><li>Ransomware and availability attacks that disrupt publication workflows and prevent timely amendments</li></ul><h2>Regulatory and industry context</h2><p>ICAO mandates authoritative publication processes and traceability for aeronautical information. Regional regulators emphasize data provenance audit trails and effective date control. Meeting these expectations requires technical controls documented processes and demonstrable auditability for every published item.</p><h2>Security controls that matter for AIM</h2><h3>1 Identity and access management</h3><p>Enforce strong authentication and least privilege. Use single sign on with multifactor authentication for editorial and administrative users. Define precise role based permissions for authors reviewers approvers and viewers so accidental or malicious changes are prevented.</p><h3>2 Data encryption and transport security</h3><p>Protect data at rest and in transit using modern encryption. Ensure APIs require TLS and use signed tokens with short lifetime for machine to machine calls. Protect webhooks and callback endpoints with verification mechanisms to avoid replay and forgery.</p><h3>3 Version control auditability and traceability</h3><p>Maintain a Git based history for every AIP module with clear diffs and rollback capability. Audit logs should record who changed what when and why. These records are essential for incident investigation regulatory audits and restoring authoritative content after compromise.</p><h3>4 Secure development and third party risk management</h3><p>Adopt secure software development life cycle practices including code review static analysis and regular penetration testing. Maintain software bill of materials for third party components and require vulnerability disclosures and patch timelines from suppliers.</p><h3>5 Network segmentation and deployment options</h3><p>Separate editorial systems from public facing portals and from operational ATC networks. For high sensitivity environments consider single tenant or private cloud deployments where data sovereignty and isolation are required.</p><h3>6 Monitoring response and recovery</h3><p>Implement centralized logging and a security operations capability to detect anomalies in user behavior publication flows and API traffic. Maintain tested backup and recovery procedures and run regular incident response drills that include restoration of AIP content and re publication workflows.</p><h2>Platform level requirements for secure eAIP</h2><p>When evaluating an electronic AIP platform ask for the following technical guarantees and features.</p><ul><li>Tenant level isolation and encrypted storage to preserve sovereignty and to prevent data leakage between organizations</li><li>Role based access control with configurable reviewer and approver workflows that include digital signatures</li><li>Git based version control and AIRAC cycle automation for precise effective date management and full audit trails</li><li>Secure API first distribution that uses TLS signed tokens and allows granular key rotation and revocation</li><li>Webhook verification and rate limiting to protect downstream systems from forged or amplified events</li><li>Compliance with security standards and independent attestations such as SOC 2 and ISO 27001</li><li>Support for managed hosting private cloud or single tenant deployments depending on regulatory needs</li></ul><h2>How FlyClim eAIP reduces cyber risk</h2><p>The FlyClim eAIP platform is built with aviation specific security controls that map directly to the needs above. Relevant capabilities include tenant level isolation encrypted storage and role based access control. The platform uses Git based version control and AIRAC automation to create an auditable history of every change. APIs and webhooks provide authorized machine access with token based authentication and can be combined with traffic limits and verification to reduce abuse.</p><p>FlyClim publishes security posture information and offers deployment options including managed hosting private cloud or an isolated single tenant setup so authorities can choose the level of separation required by national policy. The platform also lists compliance with SOC 2 and industry ready encryption standards which help when documenting compliance for auditors and partners.</p><h2>Operational best practices for Civil Aviation Authorities</h2><ol><li>Define a security governance model that assigns responsibility for publication integrity incident response and third party assessment</li><li>Adopt a strict change approval process that requires at least one independent reviewer for critical AIP modules</li><li>Integrate publication systems with a SIEM and configure alerts for anomalous publication activity large exports and repeated failed logins</li><li>Use API keys with scoped permissions short validity and regular rotation for every downstream consumer</li><li>Run a regular exercise that simulates a publication outage or a corrupted AIP module and validate recovery procedures within planned RTO targets</li><li>Establish a vulnerability disclosure and third party patch policy to ensure external libraries and vendor components are updated promptly</li></ol><h2>Incident response checklist for AIP compromise</h2><ul><li>Immediate step Lock down write access to the affected modules and revoke compromised credentials</li><li>Containment step Capture forensic logs export current repository state and isolate affected systems</li><li>Eradication step Rollback to the last trusted version verify integrity and apply fixes to prevent recurrence</li><li>Recovery step Publish verified AIP content and notify downstream consumers and regulators with an auditable timeline</li><li>Post incident step Run a root cause analysis update procedures and share lessons learned with staff and partners</li></ul><h2>Practical integration points that need protection</h2><p>Modern AIM workflows connect many systems. Protecting these links reduces overall risk.</p><ul><li>NOTAM creation and notification flows Ensure NOTAM APIs are authenticated and that auto generated notices are subject to the same approval rules as AIP changes</li><li>Navigation database and charting exports Use signed feeds and integrity checks to prevent corrupted data from reaching avionics</li><li>UTM and UAM interfaces when publishing urban corridors use secure geospatial APIs and protect webhook receivers</li><li>Satellite and satcom integrations ensure any remote command or procedure update has multi party validation and end to end integrity checks</li></ul><h2>Conclusion and next steps</h2><p>Aviation is becoming more connected and more dependent on authoritative machine readable aeronautical data. Security is not an optional extra. It is a safety requirement. Civil Aviation Authorities should treat AIP publication integrity with the same discipline used for operational systems. Choose platforms that provide tenant level isolation role based workflows Git based auditability and strong encryption. Combine those capabilities with robust governance monitoring and incident response and you will substantially reduce the risk that a cyber event becomes a safety event.</p><p>To learn more about secure eAIP operations and to request a demo visit the FlyClim eAIP platform at <a href="https://eaip.flyclim.com">https://eaip.flyclim.com</a> and the FlyClim site at <a href="https://flyclim.com">https://flyclim.com</a>. For direct questions contact Davide Raro at davide@flyclim.com.</p>